We suggest a BUY rating on Sinopec (NYSE:SNP). Although SNP experienced a decrease in net profit last year due to 2008’s record high crude oil prices, 2009 first quarter results marked a significant improvement in profitability. Net profit increased 85% as crude oil prices averaged around $45 per barrel in the 2009 first quarter, compared to over $100 per barrel in 2008. With lower crude oil prices and a new pricing mechanism which adjusts for the cost of crude oil, we expect another positive quarter from Sinopec (NYSE:SNP).
Lower oil prices, profitability increases
Despite the high international crude oil prices which increased SNP’s operating expenses, the government maintained a cap on domestic price of refined oil products. As a result, net operating profit fell by 47.3%. However, crude oil prices early this year were significantly below last year’s and SNP reported a profitable first quarter.
A new pricing mechanism
The implementation of the new pricing mechanism introduces a market-based ceiling price that is linked to the cost of crude oil, thus allowing companies to pass on high crude oil prices to consumers. We expect this reform to shield SNP from incurring large losses if the crude oil price increases significantly in the future.
Positive outlook, moderate valuation
High P/E ratio and positive profitability estimates suggests a favorable outlook for SNP in 2009. Net income for the year is forecasted to be 65,970 million, with an EPS of 0.75. We project a future growth rate of 20%.

SINOPEC Corporation
|
Key Income Statement Data |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
(RMB, millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue |
823,272 |
1,071,402 |
1,173,869 |
1,420,321 |
|
Total Operating Expenses |
(764,441) |
(992,582) |
(1,123,842) |
(1,474,320) |
|
Operating Profit |
68,246 |
83,820 |
85,864 |
28,123 |
|
Net Finance Costs |
(4,625) |
(6,100) |
(8,101) |
(3,776) |
|
Profit Before Taxation |
64,656 |
78,923 |
83,464 |
24,317 |
|
Tax Benefit/ (Expense) |
(19,880) |
(235,315) |
(24,721) |
1,883 |
|
Profit for the Year |
44,776 |
55,408 |
58,743 |
26,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Cash Flow Statement Data |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
Net Cash from Operating Activities |
78,214 |
95,875 |
119,594 |
67,712 |
|
Net Cash used in Investing Activities |
(77,523) |
(103,023) |
(113,587) |
(110,158) |
|
Net cash (used in)Financing Activities |
(4,851) |
1,192 |
(5,310) |
41,777 |
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
(4,160) |
(5,956) |
697 |
(669) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Balance Sheet Data |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
Cash & Equivalents |
5,014 |
2,763 |
7,969 |
6,948 |
|
Total Current Assets |
81,257 |
83,788 |
185,116 |
164,311 |
|
Property, Plant & Equipment |
170,711 |
270,783 |
375,142 |
403,265 |
|
Construction in progress |
39,086 |
41,139 |
95,408 |
121,886 |
|
Total Assets |
388,419 |
490,154 |
732,725 |
767,827 |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
119,968 |
173,380 |
265,355 |
274,537 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
53,401 |
52,689 |
83,134 |
90,254 |
|
Total Liabilities |
215,112 |
271,851 |
399,967 |
418,505 |
|
Total Equity |
173,307 |
218,303 |
332,758 |
349,322 |
|
Total Equity & Liabilities |
388,419 |
490,154 |
732,725 |
767,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Comparisons |
Company |
Industry |
Sector |
S&P 500 |
|
P/E Ratio (TTM) |
17.84 |
7.22 |
68.56 |
95.07 |
|
Beta |
1.65 |
0.96 |
0.45 |
0.99 |
|
Dividend Yield |
3.35 |
1.86 |
0.42 |
2.61 |
|
Payout Ratio (TTM) |
34.95 |
23.05 |
86.20 |
56.18 |
|
Sales (MRQ) vs Qtr. 1 Yr Ago |
11.91 |
-30.83 |
12.86 |
-7.31 |
|
Sales (TTM) vs TTM 1 Yr. Ago |
20.52
|
15.06
|
14.24
|
3.53
|
|
EPS (MRQ) vs Qtr 1 Yr. Ago |
2.86 |
-108.79 |
-126.96 |
-38.01 |
|
Current Ratio (MRQ) |
0.60 |
1.22 |
1.38 |
1.47 |
|
Total Debt to Equity (MRQ) |
68.65 |
29.37 |
105.23 |
130.72 |
|
Asset Turnover (TTM) |
1.94 |
1.31 |
0.82 |
0.83 |
|
Return On Assets (TTM) |
3.49 |
9.97 |
3.44 |
6.98 |
|
Return On Equity (TTM) |
9.36 |
17.74 |
8.76 |
21.14 |
|
Gross Margin (TTM) |
5.52 |
36.61 |
20.95 |
39.06 |
|
Operating Margin (TTM) |
1.94 |
12.84 |
5.49 |
- |
|
Pre-Tax Margin (TTM) |
1.67 |
12.30 |
4.58 |
11.60 |
|
Net Profit Margin (TTM) |
1.80 |
7.56 |
2.78 |
8.08 |
Summary
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec Corp) is an integrated energy and chemical company with principal businesses of exploration, production and trading of petroleum and natural gas, refining and sales of petroleum products and production and sales of chemical products. Sinopec has a competitive advantage as the largest petrochemical producer in
For complete report with charts, please click on pdf file: CV_SNP_H1_09.pdf
1. Lower oil prices, profitability increases
In 2008, Sinopec Corp experienced a decrease in net profit. Under its financial statements prepared in accordance to IFRS, Sinopec’s net profit attributable to equity shareholders of the company fell 47.3%, from 56,533 million (M) in 2007 to 29,769M in 2008. This is a marked change given that profit increased from 53,603M in 2006 to 56,533M in 2007. Consequently, earnings per share also dropped from 0.652 in 2007 to 0.343 in 2008.
This fall in profitability is primarily due to the increased crude oil prices in 2008 which caused operating expenses to increase by 31.2% over 2007. Crude oil prices peaked at $145 per barrel in July 2008.
Historical Crude Oil Prices (Monthly)

Purchasing expenses of crude oil constitute a significant component of SNP’s operating costs. As a result of the price hike, Sinopec’s purchasing expenses of crude oil and supplies increased by 32.4% in 2008, and accounted for 87.2% of the total operating costs. Yet, the government maintained a cap on the domestic price of refined oil products which caused a fall in net operating profit of 67.2% in 2008 and the company made an operating loss of 26,066M.
As demonstrated by the charts below, there is an inverse relationship between the company’s profits and oil prices. SNP has been more adversely affected by the oil prices than its competitors.
Sinopec Profit Margin vs Oil Price

Profit Margin vs Oil Price for SNP, PTR & CEO

Total revenue remained higher than its competitors due to the positive sales growth experienced by SNP in the last five years. Meanwhile, earnings per share have been on the rise since 2004, but declined in 2008.
Total Revenue for SNP, PTR & CEO

EPS for SNP, PTR, & CEO

However, net profit in 2009 Q1 increased 85% to 11,219M and earnings per share had risen from 0.070 to 0.129. Crude oil prices dropped significantly since 2008 from an average above $100 per barrel to an average of $45 per barrel in first quarter. While the drop in crude oil price reduced profits in the exploration and production segment by 76.1% when compared to 2008 Q1, the refining segment benefited from lower purchasing costs of crude oil, resulting in an operating profit of 7,328M.
Quarterly Net Profit for SNP

2. Oil price reform, a new pricing mechanism
Another factor that contributed to the increased profitability in 2009 Q1 was the establishment of the new pricing mechanism based on the “Notice on the Implementation of Price, Tax, and Fee Reforms for Refined Oil Products” promulgated by the State Council on December 18, 2008, and effective from January 1, 2009.
- Changes to the oil pricing regime
Prior to this reform, the government maintained a cap on the domestic price of refined oil products, which led to the fall in SNP’s net profit when crude oil prices rose above $100 per barrel during 2008. Under this new pricing mechanism, the government has introduced a market-based ceiling price that is linked to the price of crude oil.
According to the
- Impact on profitability
Previously, as at April 2008, $68 was approximately the point at which cost equals revenue for most Chinese oil companies, above which they would face a loss, while Sinopec could afford a crude oil price of about $ 76 per barrel.
With the new price mechanism, profits should be “normal” even when the crude oil price increases to $80 a barrel, with lower margins once the price rises above $80. According to NDRC, if the crude oil price rises above $130, the fuel price is unlikely to increase any further, or only by a small amount, but oil supplies will be maintained through the use of fiscal and tax mechanisms.
We expect this new pricing mechanism to shield Sinopec from incurring large losses if the oil price increases significantly in the future, as it allows the fuel price to reflect the global crude oil price. There still remains some uncertainty regarding this regime given the lack of crucial details on how it would operate. Nevertheless, it marks an improvement in the flexibility of domestic oil prices.
Sinopec is likely to benefit from this reform more than its competitors (PTR and CEO) as it supplies 80% of
3. Profitability Analysis
|
Sinopec has achieved remarkable sales growth of 11.91% in first quarter 2009 against the industry’s negative growth of 30.8%. Meanwhile, its competitor PTR experienced negative growth of 30.0%.
Despite high sales, profitability ratios for 2008 were lower than SNP’s 5 year average, and relatively low in comparison to PTR and the industry. In particular, the gross margin suffered due to the high purchasing costs of crude oil in 2008. While PTR and industry gross margins were 37.23 and 36.61 respectively, SNP had a gross margin on 5.52. Consequently, the operating margin of 1.94 and net profit margin of 1.8 in 2008 were considerably lower than industry rates.
In terms of financial strength, SNP was more highly leveraged than PTR and the industry average in 2009 Q1. Total debt to equity ratio and long term debt to equity ratio was 68.65 and 38.68, while the industry average was 29.37 and 18.96. Also, the quick ratio was a low 0.25 compared to the industry quick ratio of 0.93.
4. Moderate valuation, positive outlook
|
Profitability estimates for 2009 and the upcoming quarter are promising. The 2009 net profit is estimated to be 62,609M which would be a significant improvement from 2008. EPS is estimated to rise from 0.34 in 2008 to 0.72 in 2009, representing an increase of 112%.
Total dividend payable is estimated to be 187,463M in 2009, compared to 10,404M in 2008. Thus dividend per share is expected to increase from 0.12 to 0.20.
For the upcoming quarter, net profit is estimated at 13,498.20M, representing a 20% net profit growth rate for the future. SNP’s P/E ratio of 16.42 is high in comparison with PTR’s P/E ratio of 13.42, and the industry ratio of 5.31. However, with the current P/E of 16.42 and a projected EPS growth rate of 21%, SNP’s Price/Earnings to Growth Ratio is 0.78. A PEG ratio below 1 suggests that SNP’s stock price is moderately valued and we recommend a buy rating.
|
Table 1: Sinopec Corporation - Annual Income Statement, 2006-2009 (RMB, millions)
|
Table 2: Sinopec Corporation - Annual Balance Sheet, 2006-2009 (RMB, millions)
|
Table 3: Sinopec Corporation - Annual Cash Flow Statement, 2006-2009 (RMB, millions)
|
Analyst Certification
I, Linette Ng, hereby certify that the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect my personal views about the subject securities and issuers. I also certify that no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or view expressed in this research report.
Copyright, user agreement and other general information related to this report:
Copyright 2007 Chinavestor.com. All rights reserved. This research report is prepared for the use of Chinavestor.com clients and may not be redistributed, retransmitted or disclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of Chinavestor.com.
This research report provides general information only. It is not intended to provide personal investment advice and it does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this report. Investors should seek financial advice. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.
Fundamental equity reports are produced on a regular basis as necessary to keep the investment recommendation current.
For complete report with charts, please click on pdf file: CV_SNP_H1_09.pdf















