Huaneng Power (NYSE:HNP), the largest Chinese power generator, has enjoyed an over 15% rally in the last two weeks, placing the stock on the spotlight. As the following analysis reveals despite a more than 100 percent increase in revenue over the last 4 years, cash is extremely tight as coal price creeps higher. This report highlights the correlation between coal price and profitability of HNP. As a result, HNP is expected to remain a volatile stock but offers clear value for the long term buyer.
Net Loss in 2008
The company recorded a net loss in 2008. Loss attributable to equity holders amounted to RMB3.938 billion. Loss per share was 0.33billion. Except for negative impact of broad economy recession, the net loss is largely attributed to the increased manufacturing cost. Power plants of HNP are fueled mainly by coal, which is obtained through key contracts and in the open market, both affected by the market price of coal.
|
Profitability Figures: Huaneng Power International, Inc. |
||||||
|
Year |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
Profit Margin |
23.20% |
17.80% |
11.80% |
13.30% |
11.90% |
-6.70% |
|
Revenue(Ten Million RMB) |
3082.4 |
3976.9 |
5283.8 |
5833.4 |
6621.1 |
6756.4 |
Source: www.datamonitor.com
Figure 1:

Source: www.datamonitor.com

The revenue of HNP has kept an increasing trend from the year 2003-2008; even under the global recession in 2008, the revenue still increased by 2% (Figure 1). But the profit margin histogram shows almost the opposite picture, squeezing out from 23.20% in 2003 and going red in 2008. The underlying factor contributing to these opposite trends is the ever-increasing price of coal.
Generally, the coal price fluctuates in tandem with oil prices (Figure 3)
Figure 3: Change in World Price of Crude Oil and Coal (2003-2008)

Source: NEWC Index from Global COAL (www.globalcoal.com); World Crude Oil Prices (Dollars per Barrel) from Energy Information Administration (www.eia.doe.gov).
Though in some years, the percentage change in coal price seems not consistent with that of oil, in 2008, they stick together and increased significantly (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Change in World Price of Crude Oil and Coal

Source: NEWC Index from Global COAL (www.globalcoal.com); World Crude Oil Prices (Dollars per Barrel) from Energy Information Administration (www.eia.doe.gov)
Graph of Power station coal prices at Australia's Newcastle port(NEWC Index) serves as a benchmark for Asia market and reflects the increasing trend of coal price in Asia(mainly China) market in recent years(Figure 5). Furthermore, the comparison of HNP’s profitability profile and coal price aptly illustrates the dependency of HNP’s profit on the fluctuation of coal price (Figure 6)
Figure 5: Catching Fire

Figure 6:

Source: www.datamonitor.com and www.globalcoal.com
In P.R. China, the electricity retail prices are set by National Development and Reform Commission (macroeconomic management agency under the State Council) as part of macro-economic controls, therefore, power generation companies such as HNP cannot elevate its product price freely, which helps to understand why HNP suffered net loss in 2008 and why HNP’s profit is affected adversely by the price of coal to such great extent.
SWOT analysis
Strength:
HNP is one of the largest power generation companies in
Hunan Yueyang Power Generation Company, Jinggangshan Huaneng Power Generation Company, and Hebei Hanfeng Power Generation Company in 2004; acquisition of Huaneng Sichuan Hydropower Company, Gansu Huaneng Pingliang Power Generation Company, Jiangsu Huaneng Huaiyin Power Company, and Huaneng Finance in 2005; first trial of 390 MW gas fired generating unit at its Shanghai Combined Cycle Power Plant in 2006; construction of the expansion project of two 600 MW domestic supercritical coal-fired generating units at Huaneng Rizhao Power Plant Phase II , Henan Huaneng Qinbei Power Plant Phase II and Zhejiang Huaneng Yuhuan Power Plant Phase II in 2007; acquisition of Huaneng Nanjing Jinling Power in 2008).
By virtue of
Weakness
HNP has only one wholly owned subsidiary outside
HNP’s coal-fired power plants will subject to more rigid environment protection laws and inspection by the State Ministry of Environmental Protection. From 2003, a new pollutant discharge levy system was introduced, which increased the discharge fees paid by power plants in
Opportunity
The Opinions on Implementing Further Reform in Power Industry during the "Eleventh Five-Year Plan" period issued by State Council of
Threat
The unprecedented high price of coal in 2008 contributed to the net loss. Key thermal coal contracts have not been signed up to date. Therefore, it’s hard for HNP to control the manufacturing cost in the following year. The volatility in coal price imposes uncertainty and threat to HNP’s profitability.
Cash position
In 2008, the company successfully issued RMB4 billion corporate bonds, RMB5 billion short-term debentures, obtained RMB84 billion credit facilities. Its net cash provided by financing activities amounted to RMB41.255billion, increased by 397.78%. Cash and cash equivalents was RMB 5.567billion, only 3.35% of total asset, decreased by 23.87% due to decreased cash flow from operating activity and increased investment. The interest burden of 2008 was RMB4.065 billion, representing a 90.64% increase, primarily due to the extra financing to pay increased fuel costs, expensing interest upon commercial operation of new generating units and the acquisition of SinoSing Power.
Changes in Balance Sheet
Total assets increased by 33.49%, of which non-current assets increased by 37.97% (primarily due to the acquisition of SinoSing Power), current assets increased by7.91%. Cash and cash equivalents decreased by RMB1.746 billion. Total liabilities increased by 70.82% (primarily attributable to the acquisition of Tuas Power and increased borrowings for construction projects). Company’s equity items decreased, primarily due to the decreased fair value of the listed shares the company held
Changes in Income Statement
Revenue increased by 35.8%, while operating expense increased by 64.8%, so profit from operating decreased by 115.9%.Interest expense increased by 190.6%. Loss on fair value revaluation was 55million, compared with a gain of 87million in 2007. Investment income was less than 10% of that in 2007. Proposed dividend of 2008 was only 33.3% of that in 2007.
















