|
|
To access latest Newsletter and other research content, please register!
|
Newsletter July 2005 | |||
|
Mixed
Chinese IPOs teach lessons
Mixed Chinese IPOs on
the Hong Kong Stock Exchange set tone for new offerings. Let’s wrap up
June IPOs by using headlines
of major publications. 6/30: COSCO holdings makes weak debut on Hong Kong
Market 6/23: Bank of Communications makes solid debut on Hong Kong Stock
Exchange 6/16: Minsheng delays Hong Kong IPO to
Q3 6/15: World’s biggest IPO this year has lackluster debut on Hong
Kong Market 6/13: China Construction Bank given hefty tax break to help bolster
its balance sheet, as the government prepared the bank for a planned $5
billion IPO. The picture is not too rosy for IPO hunters. However, established
firms are still on the run to establish strong presence in China. Pulling
headlines again, 6/30: Telefonica enters China market with Netcom
stake 6/17: Bank of America investing $3 billion in Chinese
bank. As it looks to us, private investors are still considering China as
an emerging market while large multinational corporations are eager to
find ways to establish dominant presence in the world’s most dynamic
market. So what does this teach to individual investors?
First that China is still a difficult market. Even though the
government is planning to spend billions of dollars to boost the country's
ailing stock markets, many analyst believe that any bailout would provide
only temporary help. The core of the problem is that non-tradable shares,
mostly owned by the state, account for around two-thirds of China's stock
market capitalization. Second lesson is that investors has to be able to separate the
darlings from the dogs. No one can assume that just because China is
growing fast, any Chinese company will do so. Investors have to sober up
finally, after lessons learned from 2004 tech IPOs. Most of those stocks
trade under their IPO price as we speak. Third, China is still an extremely lucrative market as it is luring
billion of dollars however investors have to build sophistication more
than ever to make a China entry successful. The
fundamental problem of Chinese stock markets
Government-held shares, the legacy of a centrally planned economy,
comprise two-thirds of market capitalization in China and have weighed on
bourses for years. The Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, where about
1,400 state-owned companies are listed, are each down 40% to 50% from the
highs they reached in 2001. China's stock markets, founded in the early 1990s, were created
mainly as a vehicle to raise funds for state-run companies. In recent
days, the government has announced other market boosting measures, such as
slashing the proportion of taxable income from stock transactions.
According to rumors the government would soon start trial share reforms
for all listed companies appeared to overshadow such
news. Although the state
shareholdings are a chronic headache for China's market regulators, the
lack of investor confidence stems from even more fundamental problems,
such as widespread abuses by brokerages and the dubious quality of the
companies listed on the markets. But some analysts say that turning to a bailout fund could make the
situation worse by encouraging investors to sell more of their stocks,
saddling the government with huge additional losses.
Yuan
Answers?
June
2005 was a month when speculation about the Yuan's revaluation
intensified. It looks like the U.S. Treasury plays the good cop,
relying not on threats but reasoned economic argument: Let your currency
rise, it tells the Chinese, not for our sake but yours. Flexibility is
your friend, the market your ally.
Act like the economic superpower you have
become. The
Commerce Department plays
the pragmatist: Free trade is a nice slogan, but you Chinese know that
slogans aren’t policies. What matters is jobs. Either find a way to retain your
exports of clothing and textiles to us, or we will find a way to block
them. If you don’t like it, sue us in the world-trade
court. The
U.S. trade representative prefers
the high ground: Steal our factory jobs if you must, but stop stealing our
ideas, the intellectual property that is our best hope of prospering in
the global economy. The
Pentagon flexes
its muscles. None of this soft “China is our ally” message from Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Without as much as a nod to his own growing
arms budget, he went to Asia mid June and asked pointedly and publicly:
“since no nation threatens China, one must wonder...why these continuing
large and expanding arms purchases?” The
Congress,
keenly aware of American’s anxiety about losing jobs, plays the heavy: You
Chinese are “cheating,” some, though not all, members of Congress shout.
If the Bush administration doesn’t do something about it soon, we will.
How do you say “tariff” in Chinese? But
many think that China will not want to be seen as buckling under U.S.
pressure: Public demands, under this view, will only make the Chinese take
longer to move to a flexible exchange rate. Presumably U.S. officials know
this. So why are they pushing?
A
cynic might hope that the push is not a response to misguided political
pressures, but is instead a devious attempt to prolong the enormous
benefit the U.S. derives at
China’s expense from the fixed dollar-yuan rate. To highlight the
benefits, let’s think about this. If China’s currency is undervalued by
27%, for argument’s sake, U.S. consumers have been getting a 27% discount
on everything made in China, while the Chinese have been paying 27% too
much for Treasury bonds. Revaluation would end the Chinese fire sale.
Americans will pay more for everything, from electronics to garments.
Other global investors will buy up U.S. bonds the Chinese no longer want,
but the Treasury and the public will have to pay higher interest rates.
Looking
into different sources and analysis, the one we found being the most
profound is from the Asian Development Bank. It says, “A revaluation of
the Chinese currency would have limited impact on the U.S. trade deficit,
but it would help cool China’s overheating economy.”
A yuan
revaluation would also increase the trade surplus of some Asian
countries, according to the
study. Argument being that a reduction of U.S. imports from China would
likely lead to an increase of imports from other Asian countries.
Either
way, China will continue to grow into an economic superpower while the
U.S. has to implement mutually acceptable practices. Oil
battle sets showdown over China
Cnooc’s offer for Unocal raises stakes in conflict over Sino-U.S.
ties. The $18.5 billion bid by a Chinese oil company, Cnooc Ltd., to buy
the American energy company Unocal Corp. suddenly has raised to the
boiling point a long-simmering question: Should the U.S. government move
more aggressively try to curb China’s rising
power? Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan’s view may be the best
approach: “It is essential that we not put … our future at risk with a
step back into protectionism”. Will see. New
Capital Flowing Into Chinese Stock Market
Transactions
on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges have been considerably
heavier over June, while the stock indices rebounded and refused to hit
new lows again. It seems that new capital was flowing into the stock
market, partly from the real estate market.
Recently,
the Chinese government is making every effort, including giving favorable
taxation treatment to promote healthy and steady development of the
capital market and rally the stock market that has slid all the way by
more than four years and lost more than 50 percent in stock
indices. With
regard to the stock market, the Ministry of Finance and the State
Administration of Taxation recently took two tax concession measures,
following the reduction of stamp tax on securities trading several months
ago. The
two ministries announced on June 13 decisions to exempt some equity
transactions from stamp tax and dividends from corporate and personal
income tax in an effort to boost the bearish stock market. The endeavor
also included to tax only half of dividends for individual investors.
Under
the new tax policies, the public investors on the Shanghai and Shenzhen
stock markets will pay several billion yuan less in income taxes on
dividends every year. Statistics show that 759 out of the 1,376 companies
listed on the two bourses offered cash dividends for the year of 2004,
totaling 76.9 billion yuan. According to the new tax policy for dividends
distributed to public investors, the taxable income will be halved to 38.5
billion yuan, which means tax concessions of 7.69 billion yuan at the
currently popular 20 percent dividend income tax rate. In
2004, a total of 65.4 billion yuan was raised from the Shanghai and
Shenzhen stock markets, while the companies listed on the two bourses
distributed 76.9 billion yuan cash dividends. To access latest Newsletter and other research content, please register! |